|
TRACK
TOPIC
DESCRIPTION:
The Great
Reset may be
explored from a
complexity
perspective by
applying some of
the concepts
and methods of
complex systems
science to
analyse the
dynamics and
interactions of
the various
actors and
factors involved
in the
initiative and
its opposition.
For example, one
could use
complexity
profiles to
compare the
levels of
complexity of
different
aspects of the
Great Reset,
examine the
efficiency-adaptability
trade-off of the
Great Reset and
its alternatives,
explore the
complexity
matching between
the Great Reset
and its
stakeholders,
conduct a
multiscale
analysis of the
Great Reset and
its impacts, and
study the
evolutionary
processes of the
Great Reset and
its alternatives.
Another way to
investigate the
Great Reset from
a complexity
perspective is
to consider the
different
positions as
expressions of
different
perspectives or
narratives that
coexist in a
complex social
system. For
example, one
could identify
the main
perspectives or
narratives that
support or
oppose the Great
Reset, analyse
their sources,
motivations,
assumptions,
evidence,
arguments, and
implications,
compare and
contrast their
similarities and
differences,
evaluate their
strengths and
weaknesses, and
explore their
possibilities
for dialogue,
collaboration,
or conflict. By
investigating
the Great Reset
from a
complexity
perspective, one
can gain a
deeper
understanding of
the initiative
and its
challenges, as
well as its
potential
opportunities
and risks.
To apply some
general
principles of
complex systems
inquiry the
Great Reset, one
might wish to
consider the
following
perspectives:
•
Systemic
thinking:
consider the
whole system
of the Great
Reset and
its
opposition,
and how they
interact
with each
other and
with their
environment;
identify the
patterns,
structures,
and feedback
loops that
shape their
behaviour
and outcomes.
For example,
one can look
at how the
COVID-19
pandemic
triggered
the Great
Reset
initiative,
and how the
initiative
in turn
influenced
the pandemic
response and
recovery. We
also look at
how the
Great Reset
initiative
provoked
various
reactions
and
counter-movements
from
different
groups of
people, and
how these
reactions in
turn
affected the
initiative
and its
implementation.
•
Multiple
perspectives:
to
acknowledge
and
appreciate
the
diversity
and
plurality of
views and
values that
exist in the
system of
the Great
Reset and
its
opposition.
One can
understand
the
different
assumptions,
motivations,
interests,
and goals of
different
stakeholders
and actors
in the
system. For
example, one
can look at
how the
authors of
the Great
Reset have a
perspective
that is
based on
sustainability,
humanism,
and
stakeholder
capitalism,
while some
of their
opponents
have
perspectives
that are
based on
nationalism,
populism, or
conspiracism.
One can also
look at how
these
perspectives
coexist or
conflict in
a complex
social
system.
•
Critical
reflection:
to question
and
challenge
the validity,
reliability,
and
relevance of
the
information
and
knowledge
that are
used to
understand
and
intervene in
the system
of the Great
Reset and
its
opposition.
One can
evaluate the
sources,
methods,
evidence,
arguments,
and
implications
of different
perspectives
or
narratives
in the
system. For
example, one
can look at
how the
authors of
the Great
Reset use
data and
research
from various
sources to
support
their
proposals,
while some
of their
opponents
use
misinformation
or
disinformation
to undermine
them. One
can also
look at how
these
perspectives
or
narratives
construct
their own
version of
reality and
truth. •
Adaptive
learning:
One can
learn from
the
experience
and feedback
of the
system of
the Great
Reset and
its
opposition
and their
environment.
One can
improve the
performance
and
resilience
of the
system by
adjusting
its behavior
and
strategies
according to
the changes
and
uncertainties
that occur.
For example,
by looking
at how the
authors of
the Great
Reset adapt
their
initiative
to address
new
challenges
or
opportunities
that arise
from the
pandemic or
other
factors,
while some
of their
opponents
adapt their
resistance
to exploit
new
vulnerabilities
or
weaknesses
that emerge.
|
